Kerry continues to pick up the big dailys. Bush gained the Columbus [OH] paper and Bush also picked up the Denver Post which is a switch from Gore in 2000.
Kerry has picked up 17 papers that backed Bush in 2000, while losing only two Gore papers to Bush.
Kerry now leads Bush 70-58 in endorsements in E&P's exclusive tally, and by about 11.9 million to 7.1 million in the circulation of backing papers.
Pittsburg Post-Gazette
There is no doubt that Americans have gone from a generally happy time in the 1990s to four years of deficit, discord and disappointment. We would pose the same question that President Reagan asked famously in the heat of his own campaign: Are you better off now than you were four years ago?
Relatively few, we think, would answer that with "yes." If your answer is "no" or "not sure," then we have a president for you. The Post-Gazette enthusiastically endorses John Kerry. It's definitely time for a fresh start.
Orlando Sentinel
Four years ago, the Orlando Sentinel endorsed Republican George W. Bush for president based on our trust in him to unite America. We expected him to forge bipartisan solutions to problems while keeping this nation secure and fiscally sound.
This president has utterly failed to fulfill our expectations. We turn now to his Democratic challenger, Sen. John Kerry, with the belief that he is more likely to meet the hopes we once held for Mr. Bush.
Our choice was not dictated by partisanship... Indeed, it has been 40 years since the Sentinel endorsed a Democrat -- Lyndon Johnson -- for president.
Kansas City Star
The country cannot afford four more years of such misguided leadership.
That's why The Kansas City Star strongly endorses John Kerry, the Democratic presidential nominee.
Minneapolis Star-Tribune
Americans realize what is at stake: the United States' ability to lead in the world, protect its citizens at home, preserve its treasured liberties, and leave a legacy of hope and opportunity. George W. Bush's presidency has put all that at risk. Sen. John Kerry proposes a sharp course change.
The Star Tribune endorses John Kerry for president.
AP roundup:
The Des Moines Register, of Des Moines, Iowa, endorsed Kerry on Oct. 24:
"It can be assumed that the next president, be it Bush or Kerry, will do everything in his power to make America safe from terrorism. ... But on the broad range of other issues, Kerry has more to offer. He is in touch with the middle class. He is better informed on health care and has sound ideas for creating jobs."
The Union-Bulletin of Walla Walla, Wash., endorsed Kerry on Oct. 21.
And next a Murdock paper endorse Kerry:
The Chicago Sun-Times endorsed Kerry on Oct. 24
"We want leaders to stay the course only when the course is a good one. ... The question that Americans need to ask themselves, going into the voting booth a week from Tuesday, is this: Do you like the direction our nation is heading? If the answer is no, then your vote should be for Sen. John Kerry."
Iowa City Press-Citizen, Iowa City, Iowa, endorsed Kerry on Oct. 23:
The Journal Times, Racine, Wis., endorsed Kerry on Oct. 23:
Newsday, Long Island, N.Y., endorsed Kerry on Oct. 22:
The Journal Gazette, Fort Wayne, Ind., endorsed Kerry on Oct. 22:
Wausau Daily Herald, Wausau, Wis., endorsed Kerry on Oct. 22:
The following rags have continued their Repub Regurg and backed BubbleBoy:
The Austin (Texas) American-Statesman endorsed Bush on Oct. 24
Houston Chronicle endorsed Bush on Oct. 24
The Chronicle of Centralia, Wash., endorsed Bush on Oct. 20
The Express-Times, Easton, Pa., endorsed Bush on Oct. 24
The Denver Post endorsed Bush on Oct. 23
The Cincinnati Post endorsed Bush on Oct. 23
The Gazette, Janesville, Wis., endorsed Bush on Oct. 23
Oshkosh Northwestern, Oshkosh, Wis., endorsed Bush on Oct. 22:
The Detroit News, on Oct. 24 has a very intersting Non endorsement:
"The Detroit News will not lend its endorsement to a candidate who has made too many mistakes, nor to one who offers a governing philosophy we reject. This decision to remain silent will disappoint readers who expect The Detroit News to stand with the Republican presidential candidate come hell or high water. Their expectations are not unwarranted - we have never endorsed a Democrat for president, and only failed to endorse twice before, both times during the Franklin Roosevelt years. ... We will never feel obliged to defend a president whose blunders and misjudgments have hurt the nation. Nor will we settle for an equally bad choice."
Very Interesting!
No comments:
Post a Comment