Bush signed the bill with fanfare at a White House ceremony March 9, calling it ''a piece of legislation that's vital to win the war on terror and to protect the American people." But after the reporters and guests had left, the White House quietly issued a ''signing statement," an official document in which a president lays out his interpretation of a new law.If I am not mistaken this whole deal is illegal. It's unconstitutional and otherwise bad form. The President can't just say he's going to ignore the law! When is someone going to call him on this shit?
In the statement, Bush said that he did not consider himself bound to tell Congress how the Patriot Act powers were being used and that, despite the law's requirements, he could withhold the information if he decided that disclosure would ''impair foreign relations, national security, the deliberative process of the executive, or the performance of the executive's constitutional duties."
If by a "Liberal" they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people - their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties - someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad; if that is what they mean by a "Liberal," then I'm proud to say I'm a "Liberal." - John F. Kennedy
Friday, March 24, 2006
Lawless and Dangerous
The man and his advisors are demented and definitely not playing with all the cards in the deck. When Bush signed the Patriot Act reauthorization a few weeks ago he basically issued a "signing statement" saying that he wasn't bound by the law. I shit you not.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment